Question Statement
Evaluate ∫011+xdx using the following numerical methods with n=8 subintervals:
- Trapezoidal Rule
- Simpson's 31 Rule
Then compare both approximate results with the exact value of the integral.
Background and Explanation
This problem demonstrates two fundamental numerical integration techniques for approximating definite integrals when analytical solutions are difficult or when working with discrete data. The Trapezoidal Rule approximates the area under the curve using linear segments (trapezoids), while Simpson's 31 Rule fits quadratic parabolas to successive pairs of intervals, typically yielding greater accuracy.
Solution
First, we identify the given parameters by comparing ∫011+xdx with the standard form ∫abf(x)dx:
a=0,b=1,n=8,f(x)=1+x1
Calculate the step size h:
h=nb−a=81−0=81=0.125
We divide the interval [0,1] into 8 equal subintervals:
x0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8=0=x0+h=0+0.125=0.125=x1+h=0.125+0.125=0.25=x2+h=0.25+0.125=0.375=x3+h=0.375+0.125=0.5=x4+h=0.5+0.125=0.625=x5+h=0.625+0.125=0.75=x6+h=0.75+0.125=0.875=x7+h=0.875+0.125=1
Calculate f(x)=1+x1 at each partition point:
| i | xi | f(xi)=1+xi1 |
|---|
| 0 | 0 | f(0)=1+01=1 |
| 1 | 0.125 | f(0.125)=1.1251≈0.8889 |
| 2 | 0.25 | f(0.25)=1.251=0.8 |
| 3 | 0.375 | f(0.375)=1.3751≈0.7273 |
| 4 | 0.5 | f(0.5)=1.51≈0.6667 |
| 5 | 0.625 | f(0.625)=1.6251≈0.6154 |
| 6 | 0.75 | f(0.75)=1.751≈0.5714 |
| 7 | 0.875 | f(0.875)=1.8751≈0.5333 |
| 8 | 1 | f(1)=21=0.5 |
The Trapezoidal Rule formula for n subintervals is:
∫abf(x)dx≈2h[f(x0)+2∑i=1n−1f(xi)+f(xn)]
Expanding for n=8:
∫011+xdx≈2h[f(x0)+2(f(x1)+f(x2)+f(x3)+f(x4)+f(x5)+f(x6)+f(x7))+f(x8)]
Substituting the values:
≈20.125[1+2(0.8889+0.8+0.7273+0.6667+0.6154+0.5714+0.5333)+0.5]≈0.0625[1+2(4.803)+0.5]≈0.0625[1+9.606+0.5]≈0.0625(11.106)≈0.6941
Result: ≈0.6941
Simpson's 31 Rule requires an even number of intervals and uses the pattern 1,4,2,4,2,…,4,1:
∫abf(x)dx≈3h[f(x0)+4(f(x1)+f(x3)+f(x5)+f(x7))+2(f(x2)+f(x4)+f(x6))+f(x8)]
Substituting the values (note: odd indices get coefficient 4, even indices get coefficient 2, except endpoints):
≈30.125[1+4(0.8889+0.7273+0.6154+0.5333)+2(0.8+0.6667+0.5714)+0.5]≈30.125[1+4(2.7649)+2(2.0381)+0.5]≈30.125[1+11.0596+4.0762+0.5]≈30.125(16.6358)≈0.6930
(Note: Using the rounded values from the table: 4(2.764)+2(2.0381)=11.056+4.0762=15.1322, plus 1.5 gives 16.6322, yielding 30.125×16.6322≈0.6930)
Result: ≈0.6930
Exact Integration:
∫011+xdx=[ln(1+x)]01=ln(2)−ln(1)=0.6931−0=0.6931
Error Analysis:
Trapezoidal Rule Error:
Error=∣Exact−Approximate∣=∣0.6931−0.6941∣=0.001
Simpson's 31 Rule Error:
Error=∣0.6931−0.6930∣=0.0001
Conclusion: Simpson's 31 Rule produces a significantly smaller error (0.0001) compared to the Trapezoidal Rule (0.001), making it more efficient and accurate for this integral.
- Step Size: h=nb−a
- Trapezoidal Rule: ∫abf(x)dx≈2h[y0+2(y1+y2+⋯+yn−1)+yn]
- Simpson's 31 Rule: ∫abf(x)dx≈3h[y0+4(y1+y3+⋯)+2(y2+y4+⋯)+yn] (where n is even)
- Standard Integral: ∫1+x1dx=ln∣1+x∣+C
- Absolute Error: Error=∣Exact Value−Approximate Value∣
Summary of Steps
- Identify parameters: Set a=0, b=1, n=8, and calculate step size h=0.125
- Generate partition points: Calculate x0 through x8 in increments of 0.125
- Evaluate function: Compute f(xi)=1+xi1 for all 9 points
- Apply Trapezoidal Rule: Use 2h[y0+2(sum of middle terms)+y8] to get ≈0.6941
- Apply Simpson's Rule: Use 3h[y0+4(odd indices)+2(even indices)+y8] to get ≈0.6930
- Calculate exact value: Integrate analytically to get ln(2)≈0.6931
- Compare errors: Calculate absolute differences to verify Simpson's Rule is more accurate (error of 0.0001 vs 0.001)