using the following methods with n=8 subintervals:
(a) The Trapezoidal Rule
(b) Simpson's 31 Rule
Also evaluate the integral (c) analytically to find the exact value, and (d) comment on the accuracy of the numerical outcomes compared to the exact solution.
Background and Explanation
Numerical integration approximates definite integrals by evaluating the integrand at discrete points. The Trapezoidal Rule approximates the area under the curve using trapezoids (linear interpolation between points), while Simpson's 31 Rule uses parabolic arcs (quadratic interpolation) for better accuracy. Both methods require equally spaced nodes, with Simpson's rule requiring an even number of subintervals.
First, identify the integration parameters by comparing ∫012+x2dx with ∫abf(x)dx:
a=0,b=1,f(x)=2+x21,n=8
Calculate the step size h:
h=nb−a=81−0=81=0.125
Calculate the nodes xi:x0x1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8=0=0+0.125=0.125=0.125+0.125=0.25=0.25+0.125=0.375=0.375+0.125=0.5=0.5+0.125=0.625=0.625+0.125=0.75=0.75+0.125=0.875=0.875+0.125=1
Evaluate the function at each node:f(x0)f(x1)f(x2)f(x3)f(x4)f(x5)f(x6)f(x7)f(x8)=f(0)=2+01=0.5=f(0.125)=2+(0.125)21≈0.4961=f(0.25)=2+(0.25)21≈0.4848=f(0.375)=2+(0.375)21≈0.4672=f(0.5)=2+(0.5)21≈0.4444=f(0.625)=2+(0.625)21≈0.4183=f(0.75)=2+(0.75)21≈0.3902=f(0.875)=2+(0.875)21≈0.3616=f(1)=2+11≈0.3333
Both numerical methods yield results accurate to three decimal places, with an absolute error of approximately 0.0003 (or 3×10−4).
The Trapezoidal approximation (0.4349) underestimates the true value, while Simpson's approximation (0.4355) slightly overestimates it.
For this particular integral with n=8, both methods demonstrate similar accuracy, though Simpson's rule is generally expected to be more accurate for smooth functions due to its higher-order error term (O(h4) vs O(h2)). The comparable performance here results from the specific function behavior and step size used.